Is our AI output safe to sign off?
For you if AI is already drafting, researching or analysing in your firm, and you are not sure who checks it before it reaches a client, or whether they can tell when it is wrong.
In 20 minutes we can cover
- where AI-assisted work leaves your firm, and who signs it;
- who checks the checkers: whether the people signing are expert enough in that kind of work to judge it, or are signing what looks right;
- whether you are checking too little (errors reach clients) or too much (the time AI saved goes on rework);
- if you are regulated: what your regulator and your insurer will expect to see.
You'll come away with
A view of where your sign-off is sound, where it is exposed, and what to look at first. If it needs a proper look, the next step is a Diagnose (below), or a Build that redesigns the checking on the one workflow that matters most.
Worth a look first
Book 20 minutes
Pick a time that suits you, or simply reply to my email.
You'll talk to me
Richard O'Rourke: engineer, three companies founded and run as chief executive, and now research on how AI work should be supervised. What you tell me stays confidential. More about me.
If it's worth going further: the Diagnose
A fixed-scope, three-week review of the AI already in use in your firm: where it is used, what it draws on, who checks what before it leaves, and where the checking load sits. It ends in written priorities, presented to your leadership. Fixed fee: £9,000.