We don't have an AI strategy yet, and I'd like to talk it through with someone who knows what one might look like
For you if you know AI matters to your firm, and you may have run a few trials, but there is no plan anyone could write down: what to do first, who owns it, and how you would know it is working.
This is not a long strategy document. It is a starting plan with a first piece of real work in it.
In 20 minutes we can cover
- where AI changes what your clients will pay for. Clients pay for judgement, not process, so the question is which of your work is which;
- which work should be done with AI's help, which could be handed to it, and which should stay with your people on purpose;
- who in the firm is expert enough to check what AI produces, kind of work by kind of work.
You'll come away with
A view of where to start and what to leave alone. If it is worth going further, the next step is a Diagnose (below).
Worth a look first
Book 20 minutes
Pick a time that suits you, or simply reply to my email.
You'll talk to me
Richard O'Rourke: engineer, three companies founded and run as chief executive, and now research on how AI work should be supervised. What you tell me stays confidential. More about me.
If it's worth going further: the Diagnose
A fixed-scope, three-week review of the AI already in use in your firm: where it is used, what it draws on, who checks what before it leaves, and where the checking load sits. It ends in written priorities, presented to your leadership. Fixed fee: £9,000.